Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Vasudevan Software, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation et al, No. 2:09-cv-00105 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2009)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00105, Dkt. No. 49
Decided
November 10, 2009
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court has carefully reviewed the facts and applicable law regarding Defendants motion to transfer. The Court finds, based on the consideration of both private and public interest factors in this case, that…
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to the Northern District of Calif ornia. (Dkt. No. 39.) After car efully considering the facts and arguments presented and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to transfer. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Vasudevan Software, In c. (“Plaintiff” or “VSi”) brings this patent infringement lawsuit alleging that defendants International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) and Oracle Corporation (“Oracle”) (collectively “Defe ndants”) infringe U.S. Patent Nos.