Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc, No. 2:09-cv-00097 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 2013)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00097, Dkt. No. 308
Decided
December 3, 2013
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Amended Motion to Modify the Injunction filed by Defendants Sandoz Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Alc on Research, Ltd., Alcon, Inc., and Falcon Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (collectively, “Sandoz”) . (Dkt. No. 258.) Defendants Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. join in the first and second ar guments of Sandoz’s Motion. (Dkt. No. 289.) After considering the parties’ written submissions, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion. II.