Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

TQP Development, LLC v. Barclays PLC et al, No. 2:09-cv-00088 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00088, Dkt. No. 165
Decided
March 28, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - the court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the 730 patent. (See order for details)
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION This is the second of four patent infringement actions pending before the Court where Plaintiff TQP Development, LLC (“TQP”) alleges that a number of defendants have infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,412,730 (“the „ 730 Patent”). The complaint in this case was filed on March 25, 2009, since then a number of defendants have been dismissed from the case. T he remaining defendants in this case are Defendants Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays Bank Delaware, and Barclays Capital Inc. (collectively “Defendants”).