Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SBJ IP Holdings 1, LLC. v. Blockbuster Inc., et al, No. 2:09-cv-00029 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 15, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00029, Dkt. No. 268
Decided
March 15, 2011
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - the court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion, order outlines the courts claim constructions for the disputed terms in the 592 Patent
Length
49 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff SBJ IP Holdings 1, LLC (“SBJ”) filed suit against numerous defendants alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,330,592 (the “’592 Patent”) (filed December 5, 1998). Since SBJ filed its original Markman brief, it has settled with Toys “R” Us and has reached an agreement in principl e to settle with Nordstrom, l eaving Buy.com, Inc. (“Buy.com”) as the only participating defendant. This Order outlines the court’s claim constructions for the disputed terms in the ’592 Patent. II.