Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Better Education, Inc. v. Einstruction Corporation et al, No. 2:08-cv-00446 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 27, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00446, Dkt. No. 121
Decided
April 27, 2010
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - for reasons stated herein the dfts Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity due to Indefiniteness is DENIED
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construc tion issues and the defendants eInstruction Corporation’s (“eInstruction”) and Qwisdom, Inc.’s (“Qwisdom”) motion for summary judgment of invalidity for indefiniteness (Dkt. No. 107): I. Introduction The plaintiff Better Education, Inc. (“Better Education”) contends that the defendants eInstruction and Qwisdom infringe various claims of United States Patent No. 5,002,491 (“the ‘491 patent”).