Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Emsat Advanced Geo-Location Technology, LLC et al v. Metropcs Communications, Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00381 (E.D. Tex. June 23, 2010)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00381, Dkt. No. 178
Decided
June 23, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the 611, 404, 822, and 763 patents. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each other…
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction In this case, the plaintiffs EMSAT Advanced Geo-Location Technology, LLC (“EMSAT”) and Location Based Services LLC (“LBS”) contend that the defendant Centennial Communications Corp. (“Centennial”) infringes various claims of United States Patent Nos. 5,946,611 (“the ‘611 patent”), 6,324,404 (“the ‘404 patent”), 6,847,822 B1 (“the ‘822 patent”), and 7,289,763 B2 (“the ‘763 patent”).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error