Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Sipco, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00359 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 19, 2012)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00359, Dkt. No. 562
Decided
October 19, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re Claim Constructions
Length
91 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Opening Markman Brief in Support of its Claim Constructions (Dkt. No. 511), Defendants’ Joint Brief in Support of Their Proposed Claim Constructions (Dkt. No. 522), and Plaintiff’s Reply Brief in Support of its Claim Constructions (Dkt. No. 525). Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s Opening Markman Brief in Support of its Claim Constructions with Respect to U.S. Patent No. 7,697,492 (Dkt. No. 545), Defendant Crestron Electronics, Inc.’s Response Brief in Support of its Proposed Claim Constructions for US Patent No.