FURminator Inc v. PetVac Group LLC, No. 2:08-cv-00338 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are FURminator, Inc.’s (“FURminator”) Motion for Contempt against PetVac Group, LLC (“Petvac”) (Dkt. No. 80) and Motion for Contempt against Attorney Kent A. Rowald (“Rowald”) (Dkt. No. 82). The Court held a show -cause hearing on August 7, 2012 to allow PetVac and Rowald an opportunity to demonstrate why they should not be held in contempt in this case. After carefully considering the parties ’ written submissions and the arguments of counsel, the Court DENIES these particular motions without prejudice.