Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Aten International Co. Ltd. v. Emine Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:08-cv-00253 (E.D. Tex. June 25, 2009)

Granted in Part
Venue / Transfer Motion to Dismiss Discovery
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00253, Dkt. No. 115
Decided
June 25, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - granting #79 motion transfer to the Central District of California 2:06cv296. Granting 92 MOTION to Compel; denying 16 MOTION Costs; finding as moot 15 MOTION to Change Venue filed by Emine Technology Co., Ltd…
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Emine Technology Co.’s (“Emine”) motion to transfer venue (Docket No. 15); B elkin International and B elkin Inc.’s (collectively “Belkin”) motion to transfer venue (2:06-cv-296, Docket No. 79); Emine’s Motion for Costs (Docket No. 16); Emine’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 72); ATE N International and ATEN Technology’s (collectively “ATEN”) motion to compel (Docket No. 92).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error