Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

WI-Lan, Inc. v. Research In Motion Corporation et al, No. 2:08-cv-00247 (E.D. Tex. May 11, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00247, Dkt. No. 469
Decided
May 11, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the 222 and 802 patents. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim con…
Length
62 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Wi-LAN, Inc. (“Wi-LAN”) filed su it against numerous defendants (collectively “Defendants”) alleging infringe ment of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,282,222 (“the ‘222 patent”) and RE37,802 (“the ‘802 patent”). The ‘222 patent is entitled “Method and Apparatus for Multiple Case 2:07-cv-00473-TJW Document 469 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 62 2 Access Between Transceivers in Wireless Comm unications using OFDM Spread Spectrum.” The ‘802 patent, entitled “Multicode Direct Se quence Spread Spectrum,” is a cont…