Red River Fiber Optic Corp v. Verizon Services Corp et al, No. 2:08-cv-00215 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2010)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration and Objections to Magistrate’s March 23, 2010 Order. [Dkt. No. 171] Defendant s’ argue that Judge Everingham erroneously gave undue weight to judicial ec onomy in his transfer analysis. Motion at 171. After careful consideration of the parties’ written submissions, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. Within fourteen days after an order, a party can file written objections to the order setting forth the bases therefore. F ED. R. CIV. P. 72(a); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).