Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Stambler v. JPMorgan Chase & Co et al, No. 2:08-cv-00204 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 9, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00204, Dkt. No. 393
Decided
April 9, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the 302 and 148 patents. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim con…
Length
29 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Court held a Markman hearing on March 25, 2010. After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the Court issues the following order regarding claim construction: I. Background of the Technology Plaintiff Leon Stambler asserts United States Patent Nos. 5,793,302 (“the ‘302 patent”) and 5,974,148 (“the ‘148 patent”) (collectively, “Stamb ler patents”) against remaining Defendants Compass Bancshares, Inc., Compass Bank, Firs t Horizon National Corporation, and First Tennessee Bank National Association (collectively, “Defendants”).