Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Zapmedia Services, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:08-cv-00104 (E.D. Tex. May 19, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00104, Dkt. No. 95
Decided
May 19, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the 414 and 704 patents. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim con…
Length
25 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction In this case, the plaintiff Zapmedia Services, Inc. (“Zapmedia”) contends that the defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) infringes various claims of United States Patent Nos. 7,020,704 (“the ‘704 patent”) and 7,343,414 (“the ‘414 patent”). This memorandum addresses the parties’ various claim construction disputes.