Digital-Vending Services International, Inc. v. The University of Phoenix, Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00091 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2009)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Tr ansfer Venue to the District of Columbia (Dkt. No. 61) and in the alternative, Plaintiff’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Eastern District of Virginia (Dkt. No. 65). A lthough Plaintiff opposes Defendants’ motion to transfer and argues that a transfer is not appropriate, Plaintiff argues that if the Court determines that transfer is appropriate, that a transfer to th e Eastern District of Virginia is more convenient and appropriate than a transfer to the District of Columbia.