Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Personalized Media Communications, L.L.C. v. Motorola, Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00070, Dkt. No. 271
Decided
September 30, 2011
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - The court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patents-in-suit
Length
86 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION On February 19, 2008, plaintiff Personalized Media Communication, LLC (“PMC”) filed suit against defendants Motorola Incorporated , EchoStar Corporation, and DISH Network Corporation, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 4,965,825 (the “‘825 Patent”); 5,109,414 (the “‘414 Patent”); 5,233,654 (the “‘654 Patent”; 5,335,277 (the “‘277 Patent”); and 5,887,243 (the “‘243 Patent”). Just prior to the Markman hearing, defendant Motorola and PMC settled their dispute.