Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. et al v. Bayer Healthcare, LLC et al, No. 2:08-cv-00068 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00068, Dkt. No. 98
Decided
September 28, 2009
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying motion to transfer venue for reasons set forth herein
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the court is Defendants Bayer HealthCare LLC’s (“Bayer”) and CSL Behring LLC’s (“CSL”) (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California. [Dkt. No. 23] Defendants request th at this case be transferred to the Northern District of California (“NDCA”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 and 21. After careful consideration of the parties’ written submissions, Defendants’ motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth in this opinion. I.