Dogleg Right Partners, LP et al v. TaylorMade Golf Company Inc, No. 2:07-cv-00533 (E.D. Tex. June 6, 2011)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the court is Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment of non- infringement (Dkt. No. 107). De fendant contends that its mo tion should be granted because there is no genuine issue of material fact that , among other things, the accused products do not have weight attachment surfaces on the interior of the shell and, therefore, do not have the claimed “walls.” Having carefully considered the parties’ arguments, the court GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment that the accused products do not have the claimed “walls.” I.