Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Autobytel Inc v. Insweb Corporation et al, No. 2:07-cv-00524 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00524, Dkt. No. 87
Decided
March 31, 2009
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying motion to dismiss #49 and motion for oral hearing #60
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Pending before the Court is defendant Internet Brands Inc.’s (“Internet Brands”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). (Dkt. No. 49). Afte r carefully considering the parties’ written submissions and the applicable law, the Court DENIES the motion fo r reasons discussed below. The Court also DENIES as moot, defendant Internet Brands’ Moti on for Oral Hearing on its motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 60). II. Factual and Procedural Background Autobytel, Inc.