Saffran, M.D., Ph.D., v. Johnson & Johnson et al, No. 2:07-cv-00451 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 20, 2011)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants‘ renewed motion for a judgment as a matter of law (―JMOL‖) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) and motion for new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59. (Dkt. No. 333.) The Court has carefully considered the parties‘ positions and the applicable law, and for the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendants‘ motions. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On January 12, 2011, a jury trial commenced in this case. Plaintiff Dr.