Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Allstar Tire & Wheel, Inc. v. Savini Styling Group, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00448 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00448, Dkt. No. 31
Decided
September 9, 2008
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying motion to dismiss. Motions terminated: 9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff ATW's Complaint filed by Savini Styling Group, Inc
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the court is Defendant Savini Styling Group, Inc.’s (“Savini”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue. (Dkt. # 9) After reviewing the parties’ briefs and applicable case law, the court DENIES the motion in its entirety for the reasons set forth below. I. Introduction Plaintiff Allstar Tire & Wheel, Inc. (“ATW”) brings this patent infringement action against Savini. Savini is a California Corporation with its principal place of business in Santa Fe Springs, California.