Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. Red Hat Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00447 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2009)

Denied
Indefiniteness Claim Construction Summary Judgment
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00447, Dkt. No. 87
Decided
August 10, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 78 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court interprets the claim language in this case as set forth in this Order. The Court's claim interpretations are set forth in Appendix A
Length
25 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Red Hat, Inc. and Novell’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the issues of indefiniteness (Docket No. 78). After considering the briefing and oral argument, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion for summary judgment for the reasons explained below. This opinion also construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,072,412 (the “‘412 patent”), 5,394,521 (the “‘521 patent”), and 5,533,183 (the “‘183 patent).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error