Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Alexsam, Inc. v. IDT, Corporation, No. 2:07-cv-00420 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2011)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00420, Dkt. No. 224
Decided
January 12, 2011
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
***AMENDED TO STRIKE SUCH BRIEFING AS STATED IN ORDER #241***MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Now before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion to amend its infringement contentions (Dkt. No. 152), Plaintiff’s supplemental motion to amend its infringement contentions (Dkt. No. 165), Defendant’s motion for leave to amend its invalidity contentions (Dkt. No. 147) and Defendant’s motion to supplement its invalidity contentions (Dkt. No. 174), and the parties’ joint motion for oral argument on the amendment of their respective invalidity and infringement contentions. II.