Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Spa Syspatronic, AG v. Verifone, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00416 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 2008)

Granted
Summary Judgment IPR / PTAB
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00416, Dkt. No. 89
Decided
April 24, 2008
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
***VACATED PER ORDER #107***MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - for foregoing reasons dfts Motion to Stay Proceedings 50 is granted. The court orders the parties to provide a status report on the reexamination every sixty (60) days from the …
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants VeriFone, Inc.’s and VeriFone Holdings, Inc.’s (hereinafter “VeriFone” or “Defendants”) Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending a Reexamination of the Patent-in- Suit (Doc. No. 50). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND On September 18, 2007, Spa Sy spatronic, AG (her einafter “Spa”) f iled suit alleg ing Defendants are actively infringing U.S. Patent No. 5,093,862 (hereinafter “the ‘862 patent”).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error