Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v. Yahoo! Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00403 (E.D. Tex. May 10, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00403, Dkt. No. 148
Decided
May 10, 2010
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues herein (see order for details)
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After co nsidering the submissions and the arg uments of counse l, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction In this case, the pla intiff Paid Searc h Engi ne Tools, L LC (“PSET”) c ontends that the defendants Yahoo! I nc. (“ Yahoo”), Goog le, I nc. (“ Google”), and Microsof t Corporation (“Microsoft”) infringe various claims of United States Patent No. 7,043,450 B2 (“the ‘450 patent”). PSET’s asserted claims are 1, 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, 13, 15, 18, and 22.