Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mediostream, Inc. v. Acer America Corporation et al, No. 2:07-cv-00376 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 26, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00376, Dkt. No. 152
Decided
September 26, 2008
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying motion #63 to transfer venue
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction In this patent infringement case, the plaintiff, MedioStream, Inc. (“MedioStream”), seeks damages for infringement of United States Patent No. 7,009,655 B2 (“the ‘655 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,283,172 (“the ‘172 patent”). The defendants are Acer America Corporation (“Acer”), Apple Computer, Inc. (“Apple”), Dell, Inc. (“Dell”), Gateway, Inc. (“Gateway”), ASUS Computer International, Inc. (“ASUS”), CyberLink, Inc. (“CyberLink”), Sony Electronics, Inc. (“Sony”), Nero, Inc. (“Nero”) and Sonic Solutions (“Sonic”).