Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

International Printer Corp v. Brother International Corp et al, No. 2:07-cv-00361 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00361, Dkt. No. 264
Decided
September 9, 2008
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying Oc'e N.V.'s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the court is Defendant Océ N.V.’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. (Dkt. # 81) After reviewing the parties’ briefs and applicable case law, the Court DENIES the motion for the reasons set forth below. I. Introduction Plaintiff International Printer Corp. (“IPC”) brings this patent infringement action against several defendants, including Océ N.V. and its worldwide affiliates. Océ N.V. is a Netherlands corporation that was organized in 1928 and is based in Venlo, The Netherlands. In its brief to the court, Océ N.V.