Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

JuxtaComm Tech Inc. v. Ascential Software Corp et al, No. 2:07-cv-00359 (E.D. Tex. July 14, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00359, Dkt. No. 631
Decided
July 14, 2009
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the foregoing reasons, the Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth herein. The claims with the disputed terms in bold are set forth in Appendix A. For ease of reference, the Court's …
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION JUXTACOMM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff vs. ASCENTIAL SOFTWARE CORPORATION, BUSINESS OBJECTS SA, BUSINESS OBJECTS AMERICA, CA, INC., COGNOS CORPORATION, DATAMIRROR, INC., FIORANO SOFTWARE, INC., HUMMINGBIRD LTD., INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, INFORMATICA CORPORATION, INFORMATION BUILDERS, INC., METASTORM, INC., MICROSOFT CORPORATION, OPEN TEXT CORPORATION, SOFTWARE AG, INC., SYBASE, INC., WEBMETHODS, INC., and INT…