Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00341 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 23, 2011)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Pending before the court are defendant Cisco Sy stems, Inc.’s (“Cisco”) motions for: (1) reconsideration or, in the alternative, clarification of the court’s order granting a new trial on the issues of indirect infringement and damages (Dkt . No. 362); and (2) certifi cation of the new trial order for interlocutory appeal (Dkt. No. 368). For the reasons discussed below, the court DENIES the motions. II.