Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Arthrex, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00335 (E.D. Tex. June 15, 2010)

Granted in Part
Attorneys' Fees
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00335, Dkt. No. 241
Decided
June 15, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION - The Court rejects Smith & Nephews request for Arthrex to pay the costs of private process server fees. The Court orders Arthrex to pay an award of costs in the following amounts: (1) Fees of Clerk in the amount of $…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Smith and Nephe w, Inc.’s (“Smith & Nephew’s”) contested bill of costs and memorandum of law in support thereof. [Dkt. Nos. 202 and 203.] For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Smith & Nephew’s bill of costs. I. BACKGROUND The Court entered a final judgment in this case on March 31, 2010 and awarded costs to the prevailing party, Smith & Nephew. [Dkt . No. 193.] On April 21, 2010 Smith & Nephew submitted its bill of costs. Defendant Arthrex, Inc.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case