Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Harvey v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00327 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 8, 2009)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00327, Dkt. No. 37
Decided
October 8, 2009
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER transferring case to the Northern District of California
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the defendant Apple Inc. ’s motion to transfer venue (Dkt. No. 26). The Court, having considered the venue mo tion and the arguments of counsel, hereby GRANTS the motion to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California pursuant to In re Volkswagen of America, Inc. , 566 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2009); In re Genentech, Inc., 566 F.3d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2009); In re TS Tech USA Corp ., 551 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2008); and In re Volkswagen of America, Inc. , 545 F.3d 304 (5th Cir. 2008) (en banc).