Mitel Networks Corporation v. Shoretel, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00269 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2008)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the court is Defendant Shoretel’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (the “Motion”) (#16). After considering the filings of the parties and the applicable law, the court DENIES the Motion for the reasons expressed below. I. Factual Background On J une 27, 2007, Plaintiff Mitel Networks f iled suit ag ainst D efendant Shoretel, Inc. alleging that the defendant infringed United States Patents Nos. 5,940834; 5,703,942; 5,541,983; and 5,657,446.