Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Blockdot, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00263 (E.D. Tex. June 3, 2010)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant New York Ti me Company’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s claim construction order and Defendants Google Inc. ’s and YouTube LLC’s motion on same. [See Dkt. No. 258 in case number 207-CV-263 and Dkt. No. 254 in case number 207- CV-555]. The two pending motions contain substantially the same arguments and will be treated 2 as one motion for the purposes of this order. Pl aintiff Beneficial Innovations, Inc. (“Beneficial”) opposes Defendants’ request. For the followi ng reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motions.