Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tyco Healthcare Group LP et al v. E-Z-Em, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00262 (E.D. Tex. May 24, 2010)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00262, Dkt. No. 593
Decided
May 24, 2010
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying in part Motion for a Protective Order #466 ruling set forth herein
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for a Protective Order. [Dkt. No. 466] Plaintiffs are seeking discovery of documents that are being withheld as pr ivileged. For the reasons set forth in the opinion below, the Court DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion. I. Background Plaintiffs Mallinckrodt Inc. and Liebel-Flars heim Company (“Mallinckrodt”) filed this law suit against Defendants on June 20, 2007, asserting, inter alia , willful infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,868,710 (“the ‘710 pa tent”). Defendants E-Z-EM , Inc. and ACIST Medical Systems, Inc.