Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Johnson Matthey Inc. v. Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00260 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00260, Dkt. No. 67
Decided
September 25, 2008
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - dfts have filed motions to transfer venue, contending that the case should be transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. For reasons herein these motion 24, 25 are denied
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction In this patent infringement case, the plaintiff, Johnson Matthey Inc. (“Johnson Matthey”), seeks damages for infringement of United States Patent No. 6,096,760 (“ the ‘760 patent”). The defendants are Noven Phar maceuticals, Inc. (“Noven”), Shire US, I nc. (“Shire US”), a nd Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited (“Shire Ireland”). The defendants have filed motions to transfer venue, c ontending tha t th e c ase sh ould b e transferred to the Ea stern Di strict of Pe nnsylvania (##24,25).