Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson and Company, No. 2:07-cv-00250 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2013)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00250, Dkt. No. 409
Decided
August 7, 2013
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Becton, Dick inson and Company’s Rule 60(b)(5) Motion to Conform Judgment to Federal Circuit Manda te (Dkt. No. 395), filed on March 8, 2013. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on May 13, 2013 (Dkt. No. 402) recommending denial of the Motion. BD relies upon cases where damage awards were revi sited after the partial reversal of a jury’s finding of infringement. Accentra, Inc. v. Staples, Inc., 500 Fed. Appx 922 (Fed. Cir. 2013); Verizon Services Corp. v. Vonage Holdings Corp., 503 F.3d 1295 (Fed. Cir.