Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Minerva Industries, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00229 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00229, Dkt. No. 422
Decided
February 3, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the 783 and 120 patents. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim con…
Length
27 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction The plaintiff Minerva Industries, Inc. (“Mi nerva”) contends that the defendants Alltel Communications, LLC f/k/a Alltel Communications, Inc.; AT&T Mobility, LLC; Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless; Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc.; HTC America, Inc.; HELIO LLC; Kyocera Wireless Corp.; LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc.; MetroPCS Wireless, Inc.; Nexte…