Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Linex Technologies, Inc. v. Belkin International , Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00222 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 12, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00222, Dkt. No. 281
Decided
February 12, 2009
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - for all the foregoing reasons, the court construes the disputed claim language in this case in the manner set forthe herein. For the ease of reference, the court's claim interpretations are set forth in a …
Length
47 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent No. 6,757,322 (“the ‘322 patent”). On June 1, 2007, Plaintiff Linex Technologies, Inc. (“Linex”) filed the instant action against fifteen Defendants, alleging infringement of claims 1, 9, 25, and 33 of the ‘322 patent. (Doc. No. 1). To date, there are only two active litigants remaining: Plaintiff Linex Technologies, Inc. (“Linex”) and Defendant Phoebe Micro, Inc. (“Phoebe”). 1 The parties have submitted a number of claim terms for construction.