Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Kinetic Concepts Inc et al v. Bluesky Medical Corp, No. 2:07-cv-00188 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 15, 2008)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00188, Dkt. No. 55
Decided
January 15, 2008
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting deft's motion #29 to transfer case to the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division. Pursuant to Local Rule CV-83, case will be held for twenty days pending response of the parties
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the court is the defendants’ motion (#29) to transfer venue to the Western District of Texas–San Antonio Division. 1 In this case, the plaintiffs (c ollectively referred to as “Kinetic Concepts”) have accused the defendants of infringing U.S. Patent No. 7,216,651, which is directed to wound care therapies. For the reasons discussed below, the court grants the defendants’ motion (#29) to transfer, and orders the clerk to transfer this case to the Western District of Texas–San Antonio Division. 1.