Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation v. LG Phillips LCD Co., Ltd et al, No. 2:07-cv-00176 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2008)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00176, Dkt. No. 65
Decided
March 31, 2008
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - granting deft's motion to transfer this case to the District of Delaware
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Transfer This Case to Delaware (Dkt. No. 9) and related briefing. After carefully considering the parties’ submissions, the Motion is GRANTED. I. Factual Background and Procedural History On December 1, 2006, LG Philips LCD Co., Ltd. (“LPL”) filed an action in the District of Delaware alleg ing inf ringement of pa tents directe d at var ious asp ects of liquid crystal display (“LCD”) technology, which was assigned Case No. 1:06-cv-00726 (“the Delaware action”).