Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Individual Network, LLC. v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00158 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2009)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00158, Dkt. No. 98
Decided
January 12, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION - for the foregoing reasons, the Court interprets the claim language in the manner set forth herein. For ease of referenc, the court claim interpretations are set forth in Appendix B. The claims with the disputed term…
Length
25 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION § INDIVIDUAL NETWORK, LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § Civil No. 2:07-CV-158 v. § PATENT CASE § APPLE, INC., § § Defendant. § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION This Memorandum Opinion construe s the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 7,117,516 (“the ‘516 Patent”) and 5,724,567 (“the ‘567 Patent”). BACKGROUND The pa tents-in-suit generally rela te to computer me thods and sy stems that provide information to a user based on the user’s personal preferences.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error