Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Hitachi Plasma Patent Licensing Co., Ltd. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00155 (E.D. Tex. May 7, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00155, Dkt. No. 109
Decided
May 7, 2009
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court adopts the definitions for those terms in need of construction as set forth in this order. The court has attempted to construe all of the terms that the parties addressed in oral argument as the term…
Length
32 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Hitachi Plasma Patent Licensing Co., Ltd. ( ―Hitachi‖) filed its complaint against LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics USA, Inc. (collectively, ―LG‖) on April 23, 2007. Hitachi accuses LG of infringing seven patents: U.S. Patent No s. 6,297,590 ( ―the ‗590 patent ‖), 7,030,563 ( ―the 563 patent ‖), 7,133,007 ( ―the ‗007 patent ‖), 6,630,916 ( ―the ‗916 patent ‖), RE37,444 (―the ‗444 patent‖), 6,707,436 (―the ‗436 patent‖), and 7,009, 585 ( ―the 585 patent‖).