Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Freedom Wireless, Inc. v. Suncom Wireless, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00152 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 17, 2008)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00152, Dkt. No. 104
Decided
October 17, 2008
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - The court adopts the above constructions. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim construction positions in the presence of the jury. Likewise, the par…
Length
25 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction Plaintiff, Freedom Wireless, Inc. (“Freedom Wireless”) asserts various claims of U.S. Patent. Nos. 5,722,067 (“the ‘067 patent), 6,157,823 (“the ‘823 patent”), and 6,236,851 (“the ‘851 patent”) against the defe ndants in these ca ses, consolidated f or claim construction purposes. This orde r resolves the claim construction disputes in these cases. 2 2. Background of the Technology In general, the patents-in-suit relate to pre-paid wireless services. The ‘067 patent issued from application no. 364,479 (“the ‘479 application”).