Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Centocor, Inc. et al v. Abbott Laboratories, No. 2:07-cv-00139 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 6, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00139, Dkt. No. 150
Decided
April 6, 2009
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - This order addresses the parties various claim construction disputes. The order will first briefly address the technology at issue in the case and then turn to the merits of the claim construction issues. The …
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction In this case, the plaintiffs, Centocor, Inc. and New York University (collectively, “plaintiffs”), contend that the defendants, Abbot t Laboratories, Abbott Bioresearch Center, Inc., and Abbott Biotechnology Ltd. (coll ectively, “defendants”), infringe various claims of United States Patent Nos. 7,070,775 (“the ‘775 patent”) and 7,276,239 (“the ‘239 patent”). This order addresses the parties’ various claim construction disputes.