Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Qpsx Developments 5 Pty Ltd. v. Ciena Corporation et al, No. 2:07-cv-00118 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00118, Dkt. No. 211
Decided
March 28, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the 499 Patent. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim construction…
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. BACKGROUND On April 9, 2007, plaintiff QPSX Developments 5 Pty Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) filed suit against, among others, defendant Ericsson, Inc. (“Defendant ”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,689,499 (the “’499 Patent”). Plaintiff presently a sserts Claim 1 – 3 of the ’499 Patent. The asserted claims of the ‘499 Patent were previously construed in QPSX Devs. 5 Pty Ltd. v. Juniper Networks, Inc., No. 2:05-CV-268-TJW, Dkt. No. 268 and 401. II.