Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Sofpool LLC v. Intex Recreation Corporation, No. 2:07-cv-00097 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 2007)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00097, Dkt. No. 68
Decided
December 19, 2007
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION resolving claim construction disputes
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction Two design patents are at issue in this cas e, each drawn to a swimming pool design. The first patent, U.S. Patent No. D408,546, (“the ‘546 patent” or “the Round Pool Patent”), issued on April 20, 1999, and includes 18 figures which display 4 embodiments of the claimed round swimming pool. The second patent, U.S. Patent No. D480,817 (“the ‘817 patent” or “the Oval Pool Patent”), issued on October 14, 2003, and includes 11 figures which display 3 embodiments of the claimed oval swimming pool.