Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SuperSpeed, LLC. v. IBM Corporation, No. 2:07-cv-00089 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 11, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00089, Dkt. No. 166
Decided
February 11, 2009
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court issues this order concerning the claim construction issues as set forth herein
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the sub missions and the ar guments of counse l, the Court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction Plaintiff S uperSpeed, L .L.C. (“ SuperSpeed”) a lleges D efendant International B usiness Machines Corporation (“IBM”) infringes five of its patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 5,577,226 (“the ‘226 Patent”), 5,918,244 ( “the ‘ 244 Patent”), 7,017,013 ( “the ‘ 013 Pat ent”), 7,039,767 (“ the ‘767 Patent”), and 7,111,129 (“the ‘129 Patent”).