Tidel Technologies, Inc. et al v. FireKing International, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00077 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2008)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the cour t is the defenda nts’ Motion to Transfer Venue, Together with Brief (the “Motion”) (#9), the defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Response to Plaintiff’s Surreply (#21), and the plaintiff’ s Motion for L eave to File a Reply to the Def endant’s Response (#24). A fter considering the filings of the parties and the applicable law, the court grants the two Motions for Leave (##21 and 24), but DENIES the Motion (#9) for the reasons expressed below. 1 I. Factual Background On March 9, 2007, Tidel Engineering L.P.