Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Positive Technologies Inc. v. BenQ America Corp. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00067 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 24, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00067, Dkt. No. 475
Decided
September 24, 2008
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION - for the reasons stated herein. the court concludes that Positive has standing, and has lawfully corrected any standing defects it may have had at the commencement of this action. The court therefore denies the dft's…
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the court is Defendant LG Display Co.’s (“LG”) Motion to Dismiss for Plaintiff Positive Technologies, Inc.’s (“Positive”) lack of standing (Dkt. No. 346). The court has carefully1 considered the motion and related briefing and DENIES the Motion for the following reasons. I. Background Positive-California originally filed this suit on January 5, 2007, claiming that LG infringes United States Patent Nos. 5,280,280 (“the ‘280 patent”), 5,444,457 (“the ‘457 patent”), and 5,627,558 (“the ‘588 patent”) (collectively “the patents”).