Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Keystone Autonics, Inc. v. Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00061 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 16, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00061, Dkt. No. 188
Decided
January 16, 2009
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - the court adopts the constructions set forth in this opionion for the disputed terms of the patents. The court issues the following order concerning the cliam construction issues
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the Court i ssues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction Plaintiff Keystone Autonics, Inc. (“Keystone”) filed this case accusing Defendants Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. and XM Satellite Radio, Inc. (collectively, “defendants”) of infringement of claims 1-31 of United States Patent No. 7,165,123 (the “’123 patent”), and claims 1-8, 10, and 12-15 of United States Patent No. 6,324,592 (the “’ 592 patent”).