Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

The Quantum World Corporation v. Atmel Corporation et al, No. 2:07-cv-00024 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 30, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00024, Dkt. No. 204
Decided
January 30, 2009
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER The court adopts the above definitions for those terms in need of construction as set forth herein
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction In this case, The Quantum World Corporation (“Quantum”) contends that the defendants, Atmel Corporation, Lenovo (United States) In c., Winbond Electronics Corporation, Winbond Electronics Corporation Ameri ca, National Semiconductor Cor poration, and IBM Corporation (collectively, “defendants”) infringe various claims of United States Patents 6,763,364 (“the ‘364 patent”) and 7,096,242 (“the ‘242 patent”). This opinion resolves the parties’ various claim construction disputes.